The European Union is at a critical juncture, seeking to evolve its governance structure and further its capacity for unified action. Amidst this discussion, our country’s role as an EU capital looms large, not just geographically but symbolically—a meeting ground of diverse cultures and a linchpin for European unity.
The proposed reforms, advocated by Renew Europe, present a bold vision for a more robust European Union. They prioritize enhancing European democracy, amending Article 7, and extending competences to propel the EU towards increased effectiveness and adaptability.
While I support the reforms, I respectfully dissent on the proposal to rename the Commission as the ‘Executive’. Preserving the name ‘Commission’ maintains a sense of familiarity and continuity, crucial for the EU’s relationship with its citizens. Changing it might inadvertently detach the Commission from the recognition it has garnered.
What’s being proposed?
- European Democracy Enhancement
- Amend Article 7 for better protection of common values.
- Remove unanimity requirement.
- Set clear deadlines for Council action.
- Grant European Court of Justice authority in violations.
- Introduction of EU Referendum
- Aim to involve citizens in critical EU decisions.
- Empowerment of European Parliament
- Grant right of initiative for the Parliament to propose legislation.
- New Competences
- Establishment of Defense Union and Energy Union.
- Exclusive competences in environment, biodiversity, and climate change agreements.
- Shared competences in public health, civil protection, industry, and education.
- EU Institution Reforms
- Elimination of unanimity rule in the Council.
- Introduction of a new Qualified Majority Vote system.
- Proposal to restructure the Commission to an ‘Executive’ with 15 members, with the President appointed by the Parliament and confirmed by the Council.
Christos Floros 