Christos Floros

Blog

  • Unified Action Needed in Ukraine, Gaza. Global Security at Risk.

    Unified Action Needed in Ukraine, Gaza. Global Security at Risk.

    The intersections of military support, human rights, and diplomatic strategies are more intricate and critical than ever. We are witness to escalating crises across various conflict zones—from Ukraine and Gaza to South Sudan— and it becomes increasingly evident that our collective response must be both robust and nuanced. Addressing these challenges effectively requires a deep understanding of their complexities and a commitment to coordinated international action.

    The conflict in Ukraine has evolved into a focal point of European and global security dynamics. We know the aggression faced by Ukraine is not just a regional issue but a direct challenge to the principles underpinning international order. The stability of Europe hinges on Ukraine’s ability to resist and counter this war of aggression. Continued military support for Ukraine is not just an act of solidarity; it is a strategic imperative for maintaining European security. Germany’s decision to halve support is one that finds me in absolute disagreement.

    Ukraine’s outcome will significantly influence the future security landscape of Europe. Our support should continue to send a clear message about the commitment to upholding the sovereignty of nations and resisting any attempts to redraw borders through force in the 21st century. The European Union and NATO must continue to work together to ensure Ukraine remains resilient in the face of aggression, as this will directly impact the stability and security of the European continent.

    Human rights in conflict zones remain an area of profound concern. Whether in Ukraine, Gaza, or South Sudan, the fundamental rights of civilians must be preserved, even amidst the chaos of war. The protection of non-combatants and adherence to international humanitarian law are not merely theoretical principles but practical necessities for ensuring human dignity and mitigating the suffering of those caught in conflict. Our failure there speaks volumes.

    In Ukraine, reports of civilian casualties and infrastructure destruction underscore the urgent need for humanitarian corridors and aid. In Gaza, the dire conditions faced by civilians highlight the importance of ensuring that humanitarian needs are met while pursuing peace. Similarly, in South Sudan, where ongoing violence exacerbates the humanitarian crisis, international organizations must be empowered to provide relief and advocate for the protection of vulnerable populations.

    The international community must reinforce its commitment to human rights by ensuring that humanitarian principles guide military and political strategies. This includes supporting organizations that deliver aid, advocating for ceasefires to facilitate humanitarian access, and holding accountable those who violate human rights laws. The preservation of human rights amidst conflict is not optional but a fundamental aspect of our shared humanity.

    The conflict between Israel and Gaza has long been a subject of intense scrutiny, and recent developments have only intensified the need for strategic engagement. The situation in Gaza presents a clear challenge, in balancing security concerns with humanitarian imperatives.

    As I continue to follow these developments closely, it is clear that any resolution must address both immediate and long-term issues. The humanitarian impact on Gaza’s population is severe (not including the devastating death toll), and efforts to alleviate this suffering must be part of a broader strategy that includes achieving sustainable peace. This requires not only addressing current hostilities but also laying the groundwork for a lasting resolution that ensures security for Israel and justice for the Palestinian people.

    In the context of the ongoing conflict, it is more important than ever for NATO, the European Union, and the United States to work closely with Israel. This collaboration should focus on achieving Israel’s legitimate security objectives while also facilitating a resolution that addresses the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and ends the current bombing campaign.

    A comprehensive approach should include efforts to secure the safe return of hostages and to negotiate a ceasefire that halts the destruction in Gaza. This strategy must be part of a broader peace initiative that seeks to address the underlying issues of the conflict. The goal should be to achieve a balanced and sustainable resolution that ensures Israel’s security while addressing the needs and aspirations of the Palestinian people.

    The consensus among experts is clear: Israel’s long-term safety and stability are inextricably linked to the establishment of an independent and viable Palestinian state. The two-state solution remains the most feasible path to achieving a lasting peace. This solution envisions a sovereign Palestinian state coexisting peacefully alongside Israel, with both nations recognized and secure within internationally accepted borders.

    Supporting Israel’s security involves more than just addressing immediate threats; it requires a commitment to the principles of justice and self-determination for the Palestinian people. Working toward a two-state solution is not merely a diplomatic goal but a necessary component of ensuring a stable and secure future for both Israelis and Palestinians.

    We must of course be careful in understanding the context and the multitude of players involved in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The situation is shaped by a complex web of influences, including not only Hamas and its impact in Gaza but also regional actors like Iran and Hezbollah. These groups, along with various proxies and third-party interests, all play significant roles in the dynamics of the conflict, and are actively participating. In fact the real possibility of a Lebanon-Israel war, once again is incredibly worrying. Recognizing and addressing these diverse influences is essential for developing a well-rounded approach to achieving peace and security, as it ensures that the strategies we implement are informed by the full spectrum of regional and international interests.

    It is imperative that the international community, through unified and informed action, addresses these issues with both urgency and empathy. Our collective efforts will not only shape the future of the regions directly affected but also set a precedent for how global challenges can be met with solidarity and strategic vision.

  • Leaderless

    Leaderless

    Last night’s debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump was a spectacle that left me deeply unsettled about the future of our key ally, the United States, on the international stage.

    As someone who has always viewed the transatlantic alliance as a cornerstone of global stability, the performance of both candidates was a reminder that we, as a European Union, must step up our actions and prepare for a future where we cannot solely rely on U.S. leadership.

    The debate was supposed to be an opportunity for both candidates to present their vision for America’s future. Instead, it exposed significant weaknesses in the current and potential leadership of the United States.

    President Biden is too old to lead, that was made clear yesterday. Despite his administrations’ achievements (especially vis a vis ‘Made in America’) are not enough to keep him in the President’s seat.

    On the other hand, former President Trump’s aggressive rhetoric did little to reassure anyone that he would provide the steady hand needed to guide international relations succesfully.

    As Europeans, we have long benefited from a strong and reliable partnership with the United States. This alliance has been the bedrock of our collective security and prosperity. However, the debate highlighted a disturbing reality: America’s political landscape is deeply polarised, its leadership is increasingly inward-looking and the geriatric duo on stage can not provide any confidence for us. Additionally, this inward focus undermines the collaborative spirit necessary to tackle global issues like climate change, economic inequality, and geopolitical instability.

    Biden’s subdued performance and Trump’s bombastic promises both signal a potential retreat from the cooperative internationalism that has been a hallmark of U.S. foreign policy. This retreat is not just an American problem; it is a global one, and it particularly affects us in Europe. We must recognise this as a last warning: the European Union can no longer afford to be complacent. We need to take proactive steps to strengthen our own political, economic, and military capabilities.

    Firstly, the EU must accelerate efforts to build a more integrated and cohesive foreign policy. This means not only aligning our diplomatic stances but also investing in a unified defense strategy alongside NATO.

    Secondly, our economic policies should aim at greater resilience and independence. The COVID-19 pandemic has already taught us the risks of over-reliance on global supply chains. We should use this lesson to diversify our trade relationships and support strategic industries within Europe.

    Lastly, we must lead by example in addressing global challenges. Whether it’s combating climate change, advocating for human rights, or pushing for digital transformation, Europe still has the potential to set standards and influence global norms. Our window opportunity is closing however. Now we need a bold and united front, backed by concrete actions and substantial investments.

    We cannot wait for the U.S. to regain its footing. It is time for Europe to step up, take charge, and ensure that our values and interests are defended on the world stage. The next five years are crucial, and the time to act is now.

  • Capital that works where we need it

    Capital that works where we need it

    Hello,

    In capitalism lies an inherent promise: the ability to swiftly allocate resources, solve problems, and create prosperity through innovation. This dynamic flow of capital has propelled societies forward, fostering advancements that shape our world. However, this system only functions at its best when it serves all of us. A market must be truly free — not just in the sense of avoiding complicated regulation, but free from the stranglehold of unfair monopolies that threaten to lead us down a path of neo-feudalism.

    To protect a truly free market, we must continue to strengthen our model of social capitalism. This means recognising the profound social impact of our economic activities and taking responsibility for it.

    When a market and an economy performs well, it is a force for good, driving innovation while ensuring fairness and equity. Monopolies on the other hand, by their very nature, stifle competition and concentrate power in the hands of a few. This concentration of power is leading us to economic disparity, reduced innovation, and the erosion of individual freedoms.

    We are indeed at risk of regressing into a form of neo-feudalism, where few, often for us Europeans, very far from home, would control vast resources and opportunities, leaving the majority disenfranchised. We must prevent this regression by fostering a market environment where competition thrives, and opportunities are accessible to all. This is not just about protecting our businesses; it’s about safeguarding the fundamental freedoms and purchasing power of individuals.

    A truly free market must empower people, providing them with the choices and opportunities necessary for a prosperous life. Now here’s two things:

    • 1. ESG goals are a vital part of achieving this. ESG principles guide businesses to operate responsibly, considering their impact on the environment, society, and governance structures. When businesses commit to ESG principles, they demonstrate a dedication to more than just profit—they show a commitment to the well-being of people and the planet. This approach aligns with the ideals of social capitalism, where economic success and social responsibility go hand in hand.
    • 2. Innovation is the lifeblood of progress. We must protect and encourage the entrepreneurial spirit that drives economic growth and job creation. However, this protection must not come at the expense of fairness and equity. We need a balanced approach that fosters innovation while preventing unfair concentration of power and wealth.

    We’ve got to commit to reform, and the building of a market that is truly both free and just. We must advocate for policies that prevent monopolies, support small and medium-sized enterprises, and ensure that the benefits of capitalism are broadly shared. We must continue to implement and strengthen ESG goals, holding businesses accountable for their social and environmental impact.

    Together, we must protect our freedoms, empower our communities, and build a just and prosperous future for all. We need capital to work, where we need it, how we need it. Human-centric capital at work. Of course, all of this, depends on our ability to remain strong enough to set our own rules. Any sudden, thoughtless shift, would damage us. If we do nothing too, if we continue our European decline, without any reaction to the state of global affairs, then we will eventually be left to follow the rules and norms set by others.

    Food for thought,

    Christos FLOROS

  • Are we near a Ceasefire in Gaza?

    Are we near a Ceasefire in Gaza?

    Hello,

    Unfortunately our eyes are continuously drawn to Gaza, as the ongoing tragedy continues. I try to keep myself constantly informed about the reality of the situation on the ground.

    Israel’s military actions continue. Civilians face food shortages, and the broken water system exacerbates health issues. The UN warns of a dire situation.

    Hundreds of hostages remain captive, including American citizens. Hamas, has submitted its response to a ceasefire proposal.

    US President Joe Biden has outlined a three-phase plan:

    1. A six-week truce with Israeli forces withdrawing from densely populated areas. Hostages would be released, and humanitarian aid would flow.
    2. All remaining hostages freed, Israeli forces fully withdrawn.
    3. Gaza’s rebuilding would begin.

    What’s gotta happen first:

    • Netanyahu insists on meeting long-standing conditions before accepting the proposal.
    • Hamas views the proposal “positively,” but challenges remain.

    Latest

    • Israeli tanks are moving deeper into western Rafah, firing at displaced people’s tents. Hamas is resisting fiercely, using improvised explosive devices against Israeli armored vehicles.
    • The relationship between Israel and the US is strained.
    • Gaza’s children are suffering the msot. Schools have become shelters, and 625,000 children have been out of school for over eight months. Tragically, nearly 16,000 children are among the over 37,000 people killed since October 7. Aid agencies report that 3,500 children are malnourished, and 17,000 have lost one or both parents.
    • Israel and Hezzbolah/Lebanon are currently avoiding an all-out war, if it happens, the regional consequences could be even more severe.
    • Netanyahu, influenced by his hard-line far right partners, is reluctant to agree to a cease-fire, fearing political repercussions.
    • Hamas leader Yahia Sinwar, shows little interest in ending the war without substantial gains.
    • Armenia has recognized Palestine as a state, urging a resolution to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and condemning the targeting of civilians.
  • What next for Western Civilisation?

    What next for Western Civilisation?

    Hello,

    Our Western civilisation spans thousands of years, progress and conflict. If we want to retain any hope of navigating the challenges and opportunities ahead, we must be willing to understand our shared past.

    Our collective story is one of remarkable resilience and ingenuity. We are the bearers of a rich heritage of values and achievements. From the early agricultural societies and city-states of Ancient Greece to the Roman Empire and the transformative periods of the Renaissance, Enlightenment, and of course the Industrial Revolution, we have continuously reinvented ourselves.

    Today, our European Union and the United States represent the pinnacle of this long history of innovation, democracy, and social progress. Together, we embody the aspirations and achievements of countless generations. But what’s next?

    Today, I feel a deep sense of anxiety about our present and future. I’m alarmed by the many members of our societies that do not appreciate the profound historical context and the continuous struggle that has brought us to this point. The cyclical patterns of unity and disunity, progress and regress, are reminders of the fragility of our social fabric, but I refuse to believe decline is inevitable.

    Indeed, throughout history, periods of remarkable unity and progress have often been followed by phases of disunity and regression. The fall of the Roman Empire, the religious wars of the Reformation, the World Wars of the 20th century…

    Within nations, social progress and regress are intimately tied to the dynamics of income inequality. When wealth and opportunities are unevenly distributed, social tensions inevitably rise, leading to disunity and conflict. Par example, the Industrial Revolution brought unprecedented technological and economic advancements, but it also led to significant social strife due to the harsh working conditions and vast economic disparities it created. Similarly, today, growing income inequality threatens to undermine the social cohesion and stability of our societies.

    We must, at first those of us who seek to lead, and then those we must convince to let us guide, recognise, that our shared evolution has always been a balance between harnessing progress and managing its consequences, and of course that it includes dark pages too.

    Social justice, equity, and inclusivity are not just lofty ideals; they are essential components of a stable and prosperous society. Ensuring that the benefits of progress are widely shared is crucial to maintaining social harmony and preventing the cycles of disunity and conflict that have plagued us in the past.

    I firmly believe that we must lead with hope and determination.

    The European Union, as a project, though facing significant challenges, is a beacon of what can be achieved through unity and cooperation. The recent waves of nationalism and populism, which threaten to unravel the fabric of European unity, must serve as a warning.

    We must counter these trends with a renewed commitment to the principles of solidarity, inclusivity, and shared progress.

    Only through unity can we overcome the monumental challenges we face, from climate change and economic inequality to political instability and social injustice.

    The long-term survival of Western civilisation depends on our ability to learn from our shared past and apply those lessons to our present and future.

    If we truly hope, to, long-term, help achieve a planetary civilisation that honours our rich, diverse heritage and paves the way for generations to come, we’ve got to ensure we avoid decline now, protect our progress thus far, look at the big picture, and ensure we are capable of being part of the global stage in the future.

    Until next time,

    Christos FLOROS

  • Who wants to lead?

    Who wants to lead?

    Hello,

    The elections are over.

    But those of us who are engaged in politics know that elections are never over.

    That democracy is not a periodic appointment, but a constant, passionate, selfless and demanding engagement. Because democracy is simply the electoral system that allows participatory selection of leadership, but leadership is required throughout.

    I will continue to do my best, to contribute to our young country’s and our Union’s present and future, and to offer you reasons to participate and get engaged yourselves. My engagement did not begin a month ago, and will certainly not seize now.

    I’m grateful and thankful to all those who supported our effort, and I’m convinced that with your engagement, our generation will finally be able to take its future in its own hands.

    State of Affairs, Technology and Misinformation

    The situation in Europe worries me, and should worry us all. Whilst we enjoy some of the highest standards of living in the world, we have become complacent and susceptible to those who seek to divide us, and exploit our weaknesses.

    The extremes are polarising us, by amplifying our fears and using each other to drive us further apart. The moderate political centre, from socialists to conservatives, is being pulled further and further apart. Moderation, consensus, policies by and for all, are out — those who shout louder want increasingly, entirely different things.

    This is happening across Europe and across most Western liberal democracies. It’s not the first time our societies reach such a breaking point, however I still hope this time around we’ll be able to handle these situations more efficiently. After all, we’ve never had as much technology, never had the power to communicate as instantly, and never been as enabled to be informed and rally against a common cause (and unfortunately, empowered by the same technology to be misinformed and divided).

    Western leadership is dwindling, and that worries me for the world’s stability. Just look at who’s in Borgo Egnazia for the G7 today. Those who are dividing us internally, those politicians and the politics of division and finger pointing, those who claim to want to sustain every part of the system that supports us, whilst breaking and changing every part of it: they simply can’t. You can’t have your cake and eat it. Only moderates get that. And we’ve done a terrible job of communicating this.

    The Lack of Meaningful Debate

    Which brings me back to our elections. Where was the debate? Personally, if it weren’t for my own social media and online presence, which I maintained alone, I would have reached zero people. Unfortunately, I had zero media engagements. But even those who did. Was there debate? Was there real discussion about the big issues facing our continent today? Were there actual debates? I’d argue I only saw shows, but no debate. Talking points being communicated, but no exchange. And I refuse to believe that our public does not desire it. We saw very limited exchanges, heavily moderated exchanges. 

    Did we discuss the urgent questions surrounding our environmental impact on the world? Did we discuss any of the crucial debates happening worldwide around our access to resources? Specifically, plans to continue to press on with deep sea mining? Did we discuss the scopes and limitations of the European Union vis a vis our engagement and influence in Israel and Gaza, in Ukraine, in Russia, in China and Taiwan, in Africa? Did we discuss immigration beyond the talking points presented by political parties (with facts and expertise?); did we discuss the resurgence of religious political influence throughout Europe? Did we discuss voting participation in Luxembourg, and what it means that so many of our EU compatriots chose to vote in Luxembourg? And how about showing an interest in all candidates? Political parties do not define us, nor do they define our ideas; it is we, the party members, who define our parties — and by not allowing all of us some minimum visibility, you are not accurately representing either the process, ourselves, or the public’s options. I was asked not to criticise the press during the campaign, but I hope this is seen at least now, not as negative criticism, but positive feedback and criticism to improve. Because we desperately need the press today, we desperately need the media to contribute to our democracy.

    “My advice to the press is to remember that you’re an important part of government and democracy, and act like it.” Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont

    “The backbone of any democracy is an independent, professional and responsible media. Their role is to inform, criticise and stimulate debate.” Peter Joseph Millett CMG, British Diplomat

    “The media today is driven by numbers. If you get a congressman idiotic enough to take pictures of himself and tweet them out, that gets 600 times more coverage than the dangers of an Iranian nuclear weapon.” Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the House (USA)

    If we want to restore our ability to decide together, based evidence and not ideology, if we want to enable ourselves to live and co-exist and decide together, we need to enable an environment that rewards stepping up to offer yourself for leadership, an environment where ideas and exchange of facts and perspectives is not only permitted, certainly not thwarted, but supported. We need the press to step up, and play a role in mediating and flourishing our democratic debate, or it will be entirely ignored, for the much more efficient, direct, and entire uncensored social media, where extremist, flashy, unfounded claims attract, maintain, and grow the voting base of those who offer very little substance, but a very good show.

    The world needs leadership, Europe needs leadership, Luxembourg needs leadership — and we need my generation, your generation, the generation after us, to be inspired and convinced, that the herculean task of putting yourself up for public leadership positions, is worthwhile and not simply toxic and thankless (even if it’s certainly the latter).

    (By the way, if some of you are thinking of our climate and ability to protect our natural habitat while reading this, well done! Without clear leadership, we will be en route to destroy the very ecosystem that sustains all of us)

    I sincerely hope that over the next 5 years, I can convince more of you to get involved, and get engaged in our shared decision making.

    Who wants to lead?

    The fight for our democracies must continue, with you.

    We’re just beginning.

    Christos FLOROS

    —

    My ancestors called themselves Roman. I call myself European. How long will we last? It’s up to us.