Christos Floros

Tag: history

  • What next for Western Civilisation?

    What next for Western Civilisation?

    Hello,

    Our Western civilisation spans thousands of years, progress and conflict. If we want to retain any hope of navigating the challenges and opportunities ahead, we must be willing to understand our shared past.

    Our collective story is one of remarkable resilience and ingenuity. We are the bearers of a rich heritage of values and achievements. From the early agricultural societies and city-states of Ancient Greece to the Roman Empire and the transformative periods of the Renaissance, Enlightenment, and of course the Industrial Revolution, we have continuously reinvented ourselves.

    Today, our European Union and the United States represent the pinnacle of this long history of innovation, democracy, and social progress. Together, we embody the aspirations and achievements of countless generations. But what’s next?

    Today, I feel a deep sense of anxiety about our present and future. I’m alarmed by the many members of our societies that do not appreciate the profound historical context and the continuous struggle that has brought us to this point. The cyclical patterns of unity and disunity, progress and regress, are reminders of the fragility of our social fabric, but I refuse to believe decline is inevitable.

    Indeed, throughout history, periods of remarkable unity and progress have often been followed by phases of disunity and regression. The fall of the Roman Empire, the religious wars of the Reformation, the World Wars of the 20th century…

    Within nations, social progress and regress are intimately tied to the dynamics of income inequality. When wealth and opportunities are unevenly distributed, social tensions inevitably rise, leading to disunity and conflict. Par example, the Industrial Revolution brought unprecedented technological and economic advancements, but it also led to significant social strife due to the harsh working conditions and vast economic disparities it created. Similarly, today, growing income inequality threatens to undermine the social cohesion and stability of our societies.

    We must, at first those of us who seek to lead, and then those we must convince to let us guide, recognise, that our shared evolution has always been a balance between harnessing progress and managing its consequences, and of course that it includes dark pages too.

    Social justice, equity, and inclusivity are not just lofty ideals; they are essential components of a stable and prosperous society. Ensuring that the benefits of progress are widely shared is crucial to maintaining social harmony and preventing the cycles of disunity and conflict that have plagued us in the past.

    I firmly believe that we must lead with hope and determination.

    The European Union, as a project, though facing significant challenges, is a beacon of what can be achieved through unity and cooperation. The recent waves of nationalism and populism, which threaten to unravel the fabric of European unity, must serve as a warning.

    We must counter these trends with a renewed commitment to the principles of solidarity, inclusivity, and shared progress.

    Only through unity can we overcome the monumental challenges we face, from climate change and economic inequality to political instability and social injustice.

    The long-term survival of Western civilisation depends on our ability to learn from our shared past and apply those lessons to our present and future.

    If we truly hope, to, long-term, help achieve a planetary civilisation that honours our rich, diverse heritage and paves the way for generations to come, we’ve got to ensure we avoid decline now, protect our progress thus far, look at the big picture, and ensure we are capable of being part of the global stage in the future.

    Until next time,

    Christos FLOROS

  • Who wants to lead?

    Who wants to lead?

    Hello,

    The elections are over.

    But those of us who are engaged in politics know that elections are never over.

    That democracy is not a periodic appointment, but a constant, passionate, selfless and demanding engagement. Because democracy is simply the electoral system that allows participatory selection of leadership, but leadership is required throughout.

    I will continue to do my best, to contribute to our young country’s and our Union’s present and future, and to offer you reasons to participate and get engaged yourselves. My engagement did not begin a month ago, and will certainly not seize now.

    I’m grateful and thankful to all those who supported our effort, and I’m convinced that with your engagement, our generation will finally be able to take its future in its own hands.

    State of Affairs, Technology and Misinformation

    The situation in Europe worries me, and should worry us all. Whilst we enjoy some of the highest standards of living in the world, we have become complacent and susceptible to those who seek to divide us, and exploit our weaknesses.

    The extremes are polarising us, by amplifying our fears and using each other to drive us further apart. The moderate political centre, from socialists to conservatives, is being pulled further and further apart. Moderation, consensus, policies by and for all, are out — those who shout louder want increasingly, entirely different things.

    This is happening across Europe and across most Western liberal democracies. It’s not the first time our societies reach such a breaking point, however I still hope this time around we’ll be able to handle these situations more efficiently. After all, we’ve never had as much technology, never had the power to communicate as instantly, and never been as enabled to be informed and rally against a common cause (and unfortunately, empowered by the same technology to be misinformed and divided).

    Western leadership is dwindling, and that worries me for the world’s stability. Just look at who’s in Borgo Egnazia for the G7 today. Those who are dividing us internally, those politicians and the politics of division and finger pointing, those who claim to want to sustain every part of the system that supports us, whilst breaking and changing every part of it: they simply can’t. You can’t have your cake and eat it. Only moderates get that. And we’ve done a terrible job of communicating this.

    The Lack of Meaningful Debate

    Which brings me back to our elections. Where was the debate? Personally, if it weren’t for my own social media and online presence, which I maintained alone, I would have reached zero people. Unfortunately, I had zero media engagements. But even those who did. Was there debate? Was there real discussion about the big issues facing our continent today? Were there actual debates? I’d argue I only saw shows, but no debate. Talking points being communicated, but no exchange. And I refuse to believe that our public does not desire it. We saw very limited exchanges, heavily moderated exchanges. 

    Did we discuss the urgent questions surrounding our environmental impact on the world? Did we discuss any of the crucial debates happening worldwide around our access to resources? Specifically, plans to continue to press on with deep sea mining? Did we discuss the scopes and limitations of the European Union vis a vis our engagement and influence in Israel and Gaza, in Ukraine, in Russia, in China and Taiwan, in Africa? Did we discuss immigration beyond the talking points presented by political parties (with facts and expertise?); did we discuss the resurgence of religious political influence throughout Europe? Did we discuss voting participation in Luxembourg, and what it means that so many of our EU compatriots chose to vote in Luxembourg? And how about showing an interest in all candidates? Political parties do not define us, nor do they define our ideas; it is we, the party members, who define our parties — and by not allowing all of us some minimum visibility, you are not accurately representing either the process, ourselves, or the public’s options. I was asked not to criticise the press during the campaign, but I hope this is seen at least now, not as negative criticism, but positive feedback and criticism to improve. Because we desperately need the press today, we desperately need the media to contribute to our democracy.

    “My advice to the press is to remember that you’re an important part of government and democracy, and act like it.” Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont

    “The backbone of any democracy is an independent, professional and responsible media. Their role is to inform, criticise and stimulate debate.” Peter Joseph Millett CMG, British Diplomat

    “The media today is driven by numbers. If you get a congressman idiotic enough to take pictures of himself and tweet them out, that gets 600 times more coverage than the dangers of an Iranian nuclear weapon.” Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the House (USA)

    If we want to restore our ability to decide together, based evidence and not ideology, if we want to enable ourselves to live and co-exist and decide together, we need to enable an environment that rewards stepping up to offer yourself for leadership, an environment where ideas and exchange of facts and perspectives is not only permitted, certainly not thwarted, but supported. We need the press to step up, and play a role in mediating and flourishing our democratic debate, or it will be entirely ignored, for the much more efficient, direct, and entire uncensored social media, where extremist, flashy, unfounded claims attract, maintain, and grow the voting base of those who offer very little substance, but a very good show.

    The world needs leadership, Europe needs leadership, Luxembourg needs leadership — and we need my generation, your generation, the generation after us, to be inspired and convinced, that the herculean task of putting yourself up for public leadership positions, is worthwhile and not simply toxic and thankless (even if it’s certainly the latter).

    (By the way, if some of you are thinking of our climate and ability to protect our natural habitat while reading this, well done! Without clear leadership, we will be en route to destroy the very ecosystem that sustains all of us)

    I sincerely hope that over the next 5 years, I can convince more of you to get involved, and get engaged in our shared decision making.

    Who wants to lead?

    The fight for our democracies must continue, with you.

    We’re just beginning.

    Christos FLOROS

    —

    My ancestors called themselves Roman. I call myself European. How long will we last? It’s up to us.

  • Is it really Europe we’re talking about?

    Is it really Europe we’re talking about?

    Soundbites dominate discourse. National interests overshadow broader visions. We lose sight of the bigger picture. This is even more apparent in these European Parliament elections, where the ballot box may once again become a battleground for national grievances and triumphs rather than a platform for discussing and deciding the future of Europe as a whole.

    So, is it really Europe we’re talking about?

    In a European post-2004 era marked by unprecedented interconnectedness, where events in one corner of Europe and the globe can ripple across continents in seconds, the answer should be, a resounding yes. Whether it’s climate change, migration, or economic instability, the challenges facing Europe today transcend national borders. Ignoring this reality in favor of narrow, short-term interests is not only shortsighted but also perilous. Fragmented approaches, driven by individual national interests, will only serve to weaken our collective resilience. To confront the next stage of the global order effectively, we need a strong, cohesive EU capable of speaking with one voice on the world stage.

    It’s time to talk about Europe.

    This means recognizing that our fates are intertwined, and that only by working together can we navigate the challenges that lie ahead.

    It’s also about reclaiming our agency in shaping the world around us.

    We have a responsibility to engage in constructive dialogue, to seek common ground, and to advocate for policies that advance the greater good.

    This is not to say that national interests should be disregarded. On the contrary, they should be viewed through a European lens, mindful of their implications for the continent as a whole. By aligning our priorities and pooling our resources, we can amplify our impact and create a Europe that is not only stronger but also more resilient and prosperous.

    Are we willing to rise to the challenge of building a better Europe for future generations?

    The time for complacency is over. The time to talk about Europe is now.