Category: Blog

  • Compete Now or Forever Hold Your Peace

    Compete Now or Forever Hold Your Peace

    Before 9 AM today, I’d already had two meetings.

    The pace is intense, but that’s what makes being involved in new ventures so exciting.

    Every conversation opens a door—new ideas, new challenges, and a constant test of how quickly I can absorb, adapt, and apply.

    Since announcing Project Monnet, the messages haven’t stopped. People from across industries reaching out, offering insights, asking the right questions, challenging my thinking. I still have a list of people I need to reach out to.

    First call was key developments and messaging strategy for Deelan, a project Panos Meidanis is leading to redefine training platforms, that I’m incredibly excited to be involved in.

    Two completely different worlds—one about the future of digital public spaces, the other about the future of learning—but the same lesson applies: the steepest learning curves are where the real energy is.

    In the second call, Brian and I talked today about how social media doesn’t just connect people—it shapes them. How easily influenced 17-24 year-olds are running around supporting new oligarchs. How platforms don’t just reflect culture, they create it. What decentralised hosting really would mean for a platform like Monnet, how decisions now will impact the way it scales, how it’s governed, and who truly owns the conversation.

    This is the beauty of being in the middle of something new.

    You start by trying to solve a problem, and along the way, you realise the real challenge is learning to be hyper-focused—knowing what matters, what doesn’t, and to bring in people who are stronger where you are not.

    There’s a temptation in any venture to try to do everything. To be everywhere.

    But that’s not how things get built.

    The best founders don’t micromanage every detail—they surround themselves with the right people, the ones who can take a vision and execute it better than they ever could alone.

    On another, really meaningful note. Sven Clement recently asked me: Imagine you succeed. What happens if, in five years, Meta wants to buy you out?

    It’s a good question.

    One I don’t have a perfect answer to yet.

    But what I do know is that real alternatives can still be built. That despite Peter Thiel’s fixation on monopolies, competition isn’t dead. That Apple wasn’t first, IBM didn’t stay dominant, and history is full of moments where something new disrupted what looked untouchable.

    And history is shifting again.

    The U.S. is locking in its digital dominance. A $500 billion AI investment will attempt to cement its control over the next era of technology. Trump is openly pushing to make Canada a state, reinforcing the fact that this is no longer just about trade or defense alliances—it’s about control.

    About consolidating influence, about deciding who owns the future.

    So where does that leave Europe?

    Still debating whether we need to compete.

    Still relying on platforms that don’t reflect our interests.

    Still waiting.

    But we don’t have time to wait.

    The future of democracy is linked to digital sovereignty.

    Right now, I’m in the middle of that learning curve—balancing multiple projects, solving different problems, staying focused while embracing what I don’t yet know. It’s challenging. It’s chaotic. It’s exactly where I want to be.

    On to the next call. For Hootsuite, the regular work day begins, we’re building the future of social media performance. The entire #Oneteam is working on solving the biggest marketing and ROI question since the invention of social media. Perhaps even media itself.

    2025, accelerating fast.

  • Are we near a Ceasefire in Gaza?

    Are we near a Ceasefire in Gaza?

    Hello,

    Unfortunately our eyes are continuously drawn to Gaza, as the ongoing tragedy continues. I try to keep myself constantly informed about the reality of the situation on the ground.

    Israel’s military actions continue. Civilians face food shortages, and the broken water system exacerbates health issues. The UN warns of a dire situation.

    Hundreds of hostages remain captive, including American citizens. Hamas, has submitted its response to a ceasefire proposal.

    US President Joe Biden has outlined a three-phase plan:

    1. A six-week truce with Israeli forces withdrawing from densely populated areas. Hostages would be released, and humanitarian aid would flow.
    2. All remaining hostages freed, Israeli forces fully withdrawn.
    3. Gaza’s rebuilding would begin.

    What’s gotta happen first:

    • Netanyahu insists on meeting long-standing conditions before accepting the proposal.
    • Hamas views the proposal “positively,” but challenges remain.

    Latest

    • Israeli tanks are moving deeper into western Rafah, firing at displaced people’s tents. Hamas is resisting fiercely, using improvised explosive devices against Israeli armored vehicles.
    • The relationship between Israel and the US is strained.
    • Gaza’s children are suffering the msot. Schools have become shelters, and 625,000 children have been out of school for over eight months. Tragically, nearly 16,000 children are among the over 37,000 people killed since October 7. Aid agencies report that 3,500 children are malnourished, and 17,000 have lost one or both parents.
    • Israel and Hezzbolah/Lebanon are currently avoiding an all-out war, if it happens, the regional consequences could be even more severe.
    • Netanyahu, influenced by his hard-line far right partners, is reluctant to agree to a cease-fire, fearing political repercussions.
    • Hamas leader Yahia Sinwar, shows little interest in ending the war without substantial gains.
    • Armenia has recognized Palestine as a state, urging a resolution to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and condemning the targeting of civilians.
  • Boosting Europe’s Industries

    Boosting Europe’s Industries

    Europe’s industrial landscape is still dynamic, diverse, and certainly globally interconnected. To maintain and enhance competitiveness, the European Union must adopt strategic measures that promote innovation, efficiency, and sustainability.

    We’ve got to invest in innovation

    The EU should double down on R&D spending. Encouraging both public and private investment in cutting-edge technologies to drive breakthroughs. We’ve also got to foster collaboration between businesses, academia, and research institutions. Joint efforts can lead to technological advancements that benefit all of us, not just our industries. But we’ve got to go beyond throwing money at it. We’ve got to actually implement these relationships.

    We’ve got to bring the price of energy down

    Reducing energy costs is critical for industrial competitiveness. Everyone tells us that. It’s common sense, we’ve got to do it. So we’ve got to diversisy energy sources, at scale, fast and slash prices in the process. Big ask, but we’ve got to deliver. Partners are playing at an advantage we don’t have, and we keep adding disadvantages for our own businesses.

    Get rid of unneeded bureaucracy

    We’ve got to streamline regulations to enhance business agility. The DP proposes a Commissioner with the specific agenda of bringing regulation into the 21st century. Easy to navigate, helping our business grow, instead of employing more people in compliance than the actual business itself. We’ve got to foster a supportive ecosystem for businesses to thrive.

    Europe’s commitment to the ecological transition and sustainability should align with its drive for economic growth and global competitiveness. Europe must strengthen its industries and remain a formidable player on the world stage. There’s a lot more work to be done, more than I’ve covered here. But I want you to know that’s on my mind, not just from a business perspective, from a strategic and geopolitical perspective too.

    We’ve got to work for Europe, all Europeans, in the interest not only of ourselves, but the entire world. An EU that thrives, can inspire and motivate the rest of the world.

  • Cybersecurity, a Secure and Resilient Europe

    Cybersecurity, a Secure and Resilient Europe

    In the upcoming EU elections, one of my primary concerns is the security and resilience of Europe in an increasingly digital and interconnected world.

    The concept of defense has evolved significantly in the 21st century. Traditional defense mechanisms, while still crucial, are no longer sufficient in isolation. Cyber threats targeting our critical infrastructure, financial systems, and even democratic processes are a challenge we have to keep on tackling. The European Union has got to make cybersecurity a key component of its defense strategy.

    From energy grids to communication networks, Europe’s infrastructure is increasingly reliant on digital technologies. A single cyberattack can disrupt entire cities, cause economic turmoil, and endanger lives. Recent incidents have shown how vulnerable our infrastructure can be, making it imperative to enhance our cyber defenses. Cybercrime, identity theft, and online fraud are growing concerns that affect millions of Europeans.

    A unified approach is essential. By fostering cooperation among member states, and sharing intelligence and best practices, we can create a resilient defense network capable of thwarting cyber threats.

    Cybersecurity is not just about defense of course; it’s also a driver of innovation. By investing in cybersecurity, Europe can lead in developing cutting-edge technologies and solutions that have global applications.

    As your candidate, I am committed to championing policies that strengthen our cybersecurity defenses and position Europe as a leader in the digital world.

  • All Eyes on Benjamin

    All Eyes on Benjamin

    “In the Bibi world there is no value, metric or significance for anything, other than pledging allegiance to the leader Benjamin Netanyahu each and every morning.” writes Chaim Levinson on Haaretz.

    Internal divisions in Israel are clearly apparent. Last Saturday night, extreme supporters of ‘Bibi’ attacked Gadi Kedem, a man who lost his family on October 7. “It’s a good thing they killed your children,” they cursed at his wife.

    Chaim goes on to write that this is ‘Israel’s second war of independence. It’s not against Hamas. It’s amongst ourselves.’

    It is what he says later that I find even more interesting: ‘Israel cannot afford not to be excellently managed. This place is violent and dangerous and rests on very delicate brakes and balances… Countries rise and fall. There were once empires, like Greece. They collapsed due to generation after generation of failed management.’

    It’s clear that most Israelis know that Netanyahu is not acting in the best interest of Israelis or Israel anymore. It’s been clear to many for a while, but now it must be really clear to most. Bibi only cares about Bibi and his view of what Israel must be. Even as world leaders try to warn him, he is responsible for the biggest loss of support Israel has seen in decades.

    Meanwhile, the world’s population has their eyes turned to Gaza, specifically Rafah. If my own social media were an indication of European sentiment, at least 1 in 3 people, or more, have their eyes on Rafah. “All Eyes on Rafah” is written on every second or third Instagram story, on Facebook, on Twitter, where people speak.

    Terrifying images coming out of camps after the recent bombing of Rafah, where people were living, thinking they were in a safe zone, have circulated to nearly every human being with a phone on Earth, or at least in the Western world.

    It’s a challenge to be vocal about how one feels, seeing the reality on the ground, without falsely insinuating that somehow, as a European Parliament candidate, you’d have any influence over Benjamin Netanyahu’s mind. And I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: most of us make it clear that we support all people’s right to self-determination, and we must ensure this is done, without professing, that the European Parliament has the direct ability to end or influence the immediate cessation of the ongoing violence.

    Israelis are scared, hoping to see friends and family return from tunnels in Gaza. Palestinians are scared, perhaps even hopeless, about the possibility of ever seeing loved ones again, unsure in the fog of war, in the dust, about whether they are separated forever or momentarily. The worst of our humanity has indeed been invoked, to paraphrase myself from October, and I’m unsure where this ends.

    From a national, Luxembourgish, perspective, it is clear that our government supports achieving a ceasefire. We do not engage in performance politics however. I believe other people’s plight should not become an electoral wager for politicians in third countries. Our priority must be to assist the people affected by this conflict and ensure the upholding of international law in Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, and the wider region.

    It is our collective responsibility to ensure we are capable of putting an end to the destruction of indescribable proportions taking place today, the upholding of international law, and to put ourselves in a position to support what comes next. From a European perspective too. But what will it take? I’ve said it again and again, if we are truly friends of Israel, we must help it from making the worst mistake it’s ever made. Benjamin Netanyahu, whether the latest strike was a mistake or not, should no longer feel capable of leading. Of course, we won’t wait for Netanyahu to find a moral center today. Has he ever had one? He won’t find it today.

    I am afraid, not only because we mourn thousands of our fellow human beings today. I am afraid for what this conflict is doing to our societies throughout Europe too. It’s pitting us against each other.

    Pretending like antisemitism is not on the rise is dangerous. Islamophobia and xenophobia are on the rise too. We’re being divided by our inability to help ensure peace at a time when Europe is not even certain of being able to guarantee its own peace. Maps are being redrawn, and what is happening is being used by various actors to advance their own expansion and agendas (see Erdogan).

    I can’t get the images of violence out of my head. But this is not about me, not about any of us typing statements from afar. I remember, was it a French journalist or an ex-politician who said, this is not the time for history lessons; this is not the time for context. Let this be done by historians. This is the time to guarantee peace and ceasefire so both Israelis and Palestinians can stop feeling fear and terror of each other and so that they can live in peace. Whatever needs to happen must happen now. Every now that’s past.

    My Jewish friends are scared, my Israeli friends are scared. My Muslim friends are in pain, my Palestinian friends are heartbroken. All of them, human beings, with hearts and fears, like you, like me. What I care about is how we build peace. And I’ve said it again and again, I know my scope and limitations. So what do we do? I ask you.

    We are setting up a generation that will hate each other. Once again, what can we learn from our own brutal history, the history of how most European countries chose to forgive aggressive countries from central Europe after World War II? How can we mend the wounds? Because if all we are setting up is a stage for perpetual fear of the other, revenge, and bloodshed, then nobody wins, nobody lives.

    All our eyes are on Netanyahu. He stands at a crossroads where his decisions will either further plunge the region into chaos or offer a slim chance for peace. It is not enough to merely critique his leadership and condemn the attack; the global community must take tangible steps to mediate, support, and pressure for a sustainable resolution.

    As we watch this tragedy unfold, we must remember that our collective humanity demands we strive for peace and justice for all.

  • Coup d’état, April 21, 1967

    Coup d’état, April 21, 1967

    On this day, April 21, in 1967, Greece faced a pivotal moment in its history. Just a few days before the general election, Colonel George Papadopoulos orchestrated a coup d’état, ushering in a military regime that would endure for seven long years. My father at the time was 7 years old. The memories and testaments of people who lived through this period, my father, our friends, my grandparents, are a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy and the vital importance of preserving it.

    Democracy, with its core principles of freedom, equality, and participation, stands as a beacon of hope for societies worldwide. It guarantees the rights and liberties of individuals, fostering an environment where diverse voices can be heard and respected. However, democracy is not immune to threats, both from external forces and internal vulnerabilities.

    Living in a liberal society under stable governance is a privilege that should never be taken for granted. It provides the foundation for progress, prosperity, and peace. When democracy is undermined, it jeopardizes not only the rights and freedoms of citizens but also the stability and continuity of the social contract that binds society together.

    The aftermath of the coup in Greece serves as a poignant example of the consequences of political upheaval. Civil liberties were curtailed, dissent was suppressed, and the rule of law was undermined. The fabric of society was torn apart, leaving scars that would take years to heal.

    As we reflect on April 21, 1967, let us reaffirm our commitment to democracy and the values it represents. Let us recognize that the preservation of democracy requires constant vigilance and active participation from all members of society. By upholding the principles of democracy, we ensure a future where freedom, justice, and equality prevail for generations to come.